Some observers have been prepared to write off these plans as Potemkin posturing-or new and creative ways to transfer more of Russia’s state funds into private hands through creative, corrupt schemes. To what extent are these ambitious goals realizable? Yet there is often a noticeable gap between declared Russian intentions and executable results. Rogozin himself has continuously warned that without a modern military force, Russia is liable to be “looted” in the future. This is in part due to a growing fear that Russia’s vast natural resource endowment, particularly in the Arctic, is vulnerable if the country lacks the means to protect it.
A Levada Center poll found that 46 percent of Russians were in favor of increasing military spending even if it led to an economic slowdown (versus 41 percent opposed if defense increases caused economic hardship). Putin has committed to spending billions over the next decade to fulfill these requirements.Īnd a growing number of Russians support the military buildup.
If all goes according to plan, the Russian military, by 2020, will return to a million active-duty personnel, backed up by 2300 new tanks, some 1200 new helicopters and planes, with a navy fielding fifty new surface ships and twenty-eight submarines, with one hundred new satellites designed to augment Russia’s communications, command and control capabilities. By 2020, the Russian army will be structured around combat-ready and easily deployable brigades, with a goal of having those forces be at least 70 percent equipped with next-generation weaponry and equipment. Navy, the Russians have now closed the gap and the Russians are, in terms of budgetary outlays, spending about half of what will be allocated to the U.S. If, only a few years ago, the shipbuilding budget for the Russian navy was less than 10 percent of the U.S. Perusing budget reports and position papers, Russian plans-spearheaded by the Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu and Dmitry Rogozin, the deputy prime minister in charge of the defense industry-certainly look impressive-and ominous. If the presidents agree on anything, it will be possible to judge in six months, when it becomes clear whether the parties have made decisions or not, Biden said.( You Might Also Like: Welcome to the World Without the West) Putin said after the meeting that relations between the two countries had accumulated “a lot of blockages”, but there was no hostility at the talks.īiden called the atmosphere of the summit “good and positive”, noting that there are genuine prospects for improving relations between Russia and the United States. Following the summit, the parties agreed to return the ambassadors to Moscow and Washington. It started at about 14: 30 Moscow time and lasted about four hours. The meeting between Putin and Biden took place on June 16 in Geneva.
The invention of the phrase was attributed to German Chancellor Helmut Schmidt in 19, as well as to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher in 19. The exact origin of the phrase “Upper Volta with missiles” is unknown, but since the 1980s, this definition has often been applied to the USSR. Upper Volta, until August 1984, was the name of a state in West Africa, Burkina Faso. “And they desperately don’t want to be known, as one critic put it, as the Top Volta with nuclear missiles,” Biden continued, noting that, ” as he has learned, it is important for every world leader how he looks on the international stage.” They desperately want to remain a world power, ” Biden said when asked how he could be sure that Moscow would keep its promises (quoted by TASS). “Russia is in a very, very difficult situation. Russia is in a difficult position, but it does not want to look like an “Upper Volta” with nuclear weapons, US President Joe Biden told reporters at the plane ramp before flying from Geneva to Washington after bilateral talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin. At the same time, the country is “in a very, very difficult situation,” Biden said Russia desperately wants to remain a world power, the American president believes.
0 kommentar(er)
